A Deaf church. Can a fellowship of
about 15 people be called a church? Is a church without a defined
“Mission Statement” still a church? What if pastoral duties are
undertaken by a man with a degree in history rather than one who
graduated from seminary? What if one of teachers and leaders is a
woman? What if...what if the members of the church are Deaf?!
If you had little to no problem
answering “Yes” to these questions (I won't insist on
unconditional affirmative
answers; Feel free to trail qualifiers after each “Yes”) then
welcome to to the Deaf church located on the campus of Goshen
College. Please note that “Deaf church” contains a capital letter
following the format of Deaf Culture's rule regarding written
reference to itself.
Wait, what?
“Wait, what”
what? Were you unaware that “Deaf” identifies a culture as well
as a sensory state? Well, now you know. Anyway, the Deaf church on
Goshen College's campus is officially named the “Deaf Christian
Fellowship,” although I have not seen that name being used by any
of the actual members when referring to it in conversation. I suppose
the members and attendees don't feel much need for using a formal
name for their fellowship.
According to Phil
Harden Jr., the presiding pastor, known churches for the Deaf are
rather sparse in the area, the closest being in South Bend and in
Fort Wayne, and at least the former of these is “having trouble
staying afloat.” Perhaps these churches draw most of the Deaf
Christians in the tens of miles range, thus accounting for the small
membership of the Deaf Christian Fellowship. Or perhaps the Deaf
community close to Goshen is not spiritually inclined towards
following Jesus Christ. As the Pastor put it: “You could say that
threatening the survival [of the Deaf church] is the Deaf people
themselves...if they don't come. Social people will go bowling to
basketball tournaments...they'd rather go there. But there are Deaf
people who like church.”
So
perhaps there are Deaf Christians who don't realize that they can get
to a church that they can be edified by more comfortably and
personally than some might experience in a Hearing church. From what
I have seen of the interactions of this Deaf church's members with
each other and with the Hearing members of the church that houses
theirs (the Deaf church meets in a room in the building used by
College Mennonite Church), the Deaf church members have longer, more
informative, and more expressive conversations with people possessing
ASL skills than they do with people who can only speak
a language (and hope that the Deaf all lip-read proficiently).
Deaf-to-Deaf
conversations among members of this fellowship can flow at breakneck
speeds between people 10 to 20 feet apart, and someone not used to
knowing what pauses, gazes, and glances indicate that someone else is
signing can find him-or-herself worrying about whiplash as s/he tries
to not lose track of the topic or any new information. If someone who
uses ASL but is not a fluent signer is involved, the natural signers
usually slow down (somewhat...they
could still be too fast for the newbie) or repeat signs when asked.
However, this grace necessitates that the Hearing person attempting
to be a part of the conversation be accomplished at at least the
rudimentary level of ASL. Simply signing “Hello,” “Good
Morning,” or “Thank You” is appreciated, but only the bare
minimum of engaging members of the Deaf church in their own language.
Lip-reading
and speaking are not common skills in this Deaf church, with Pastor
Phil being the only Deaf member I noticed regularly using voiced
words. This seems to be an extension of his overall welcoming
attitude towards visitors, not wanting anyone bold enough to venture
into the Deaf World to be alienated. The rest of the fellowship is
equally welcoming, and an English-to-ASL interpreter is even
available for unskilled signers in order to ensure that visitors are
not missing out, which is more praise I can say for this fellowship
than for some other church groups' attempts at multilingual
provision. However, I hope that, regardless of signing ability, the
Hearing visitor gets familiarized enough with American Deaf Culture
to be comfortable with behaviors such as frequent touching (including
hugging), hand waving (not limited
strictly to signing), and table-thumping (strong enough to be felt
through the surface). A little knowledge of Deaf Culture would do the mostly-unaware Hearing World some good, and more even more, much like how, to finish with another Phil-quote: "The knowledge of God is good for Deaf people...They just don't know it!"
I find it really awesome that you enjoy attending this church week after week, and that in some ways you have become a part of their congregation. I think that a luxury this church has is that because their members are a distinct group (deaf christians), their outreach does not have to be broad. Instead, they can focus exclusively on the deaf community, and better meet the needs of those who could benefit from a deaf church.
ReplyDelete"Deaf" and "Christian" are capitalized. Just like "American" and "Muslim" are.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI really like this approach to your paper. You mentioned a few things that appealed to me, even as a person of Hearing. For example, you emphasized how others use bowling and basketball tournaments as contact zones if they aren't spiritually religious. In addition, you gave another good reason why the Deaf church might be low in attendance: there are similar congregations nearby in South Bend and Fort Wayne, and larger amounts of patrons could live closer to those locations.
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting, too, how the facility attempts to appeal to the Hearing world in order to draw other people in and help to welcome them. By having an interpreter of their own, they can also draw others who may not necessarily know how to communicate that well with the community of the Deaf Church. Do they publicize that, by any chance? I think it could help to draw in others, too.
Before your presentation, I didn't even know there was a Deaf church in Goshen. It seems like a great place, and I love that it's informal and appears to be a very supportive community. Because I have little experience with Deaf people, I feel that I would be hesitant to attend a service out of fear of doing something wrong or offending someone. But after your presentation and your explanation of how they are very patient with people of hearing who are often ignorant, I am much more willing to explore a church like this. It seems to be a great contact zone, and I'm curious to see if this church will grow and how it will continue developing as a contact zone.
ReplyDeleteWhen talking to you about your project, I didn't think there was deaf church in Goshen. When you were giving your presentation it gave me the sense that this church is pretty cool! Like Maria said, the fact that it is informal makes it very interesting. You did an overall great job researching and providing me some great insights. You going out of your comfort zone and trying something new is something that I wouldn't be able to do. So I give you huge probs for doing that. Good job man!
ReplyDeleteMichael: Your description of the Deaf Church provides an interesting perspective. To have a church with such a small amount of attendees lead by a pastor with a degree in history is a feat in itself. On top of that, the church isn’t very well known, or so it seems, and it limits itself in the sense that it is made to appeal to the Deaf and not necessarily to the general population. However, it seems like it makes for a great contact zone, allowing a space for spiritual Deaf people to come together and interact, a space for their children to come together, and a chance for GC ASL students and others to be a part of the Deaf Community.
ReplyDelete